What is the definition of full-time student?

For the purpose of this international competition, a full-time student is one who is registered for a minimum of three (3) courses or nine (9) credits (9 hours – Canada and US) at the time of the competition launch and as defined by the guidelines.

Should you have any doubts or concerns about your eligibility, please don’t hesitate to communicate with us.

Is fashion design an eligible field?

Yes, the fashion discipline, at the university level (professional or student category), is added to the eligible design and architecture fields. Proposals submitted, like all others, must meet the evaluation criteria of one of the prize categories, such as complete reuse of materials, innovation, process and environmental impact, space design or product development.

Can engineers from a consulting firm be eligible in the professional category if they are members of the Ordre des ingénieurs du Québec (OIQ)?

Engineers cannot participate alone in this design and architecture competition, but we encourage their participation as part of a team with a representative eligible in one of the following fields: industrial design, urban design, environmental design, interior design, graphic design, architecture, landscape architecture, fashion design.

Can a company create multiple teams and present different proposals for the Olympic idea contest?

A professional or student can only participate in one proposal. It is however possible to form more than one team and therefore submit their proposals, as long as the same person is not part of more than one team.

I would like to propose a revision of the participation criteria. By including participants from diverse backgrounds, such as self-taught individuals with a passion for sustainable design, this competition would benefit from varied and innovative perspectives. Ecology and creativity transcend academic and professional boundaries. Innovators in all fields have proven that they can make a significant contribution to large-scale projects, without formal training in design or architecture; many people around me find this restricted eligibility category distressing. I invite you to consider this amendment in order to enrich the proposals received and to extend the ecological and community impact of the competition.

We understand your disappointment, however this is a design and architecture competition requiring one person, the team representative, to be eligible in the fields of design and architecture. As noted in the competition document (section 8.1). Multidisciplinary teams are strongly encouraged, particularly through collaboration between designers from different disciplines or with the addition of people having special expertise such as engineering, eco-design, urban planning or social work.

In France, a bachelor’s degree in multimedia visual communication doesn’t require a university diploma to work in graphic design and there’s no order or association in this field, as in Québec. Is it still possible to enter the competition?

A French bachelor’s degree doesn’t meet the eligibility requirements for this competition. Without necessarily having a diploma from the French university system, a postgraduate degree in design or architecture is acceptable.

When will it be possible to vote on the various projects (public participation)?

Voting for the People’s Choice Award will take place this summer/fall; the exact date will be communicated at a later date.

The competition document states “Any person who has a professional association with a member of the jury is ineligible to participate in the competition” May a student participate in the competition if the professor is on the jury?

Because the relationship between student and professor is not considered as a professional association, participation is permitted. It is important, however, to ensure that participation confidentiality is maintained and the proposal is not discussed with said professor.

Can the submission deadline be extended? At this busy time of year, this contest’s unexpected appearance makes it challenging to complete within the allotted time frame.

Unfortunately, postponing the date of the deadline is not an option. We hope that despite the tight schedule, participation in the contest might still be considered a possibility.

Is there a 3D file available for the inner and outer membrane structure?

No, there is no 3D file available for these membranes at this time.

Are CEGEP or College students enrolled in industrial design or any other design or architectural techniques, eligible to participate in the competition?

No, these students are not eligible to participate in the competition independently. However, they may form a team with an eligible student in a university-level program, leading to the design or execution of design or development projects (industrial design, urban design, environmental design, interior design, graphic design, architecture, landscape architecture, fashion design).

Presently, I’m not a full-time student, but I haven’t graduated yet. According to the contest rules, only the proposal representative must be a full-time student. Is it possible for me to join a student team?

Yes, joining a student team is possible if the representative of such a team is eligible.

We are a small group of engineering master’s students inquiring if this curriculum could be accepted for participation in the Olympic roof reuse competition, in the student category.

Because this is a design and architecture competition, a person (the team representative) must study one of these fields. As indicated in the competition document (8.1 – Eligibility): “Multidisciplinary team formation is strongly encouraged, with a focus on collaboration between designers from different disciplines or with the inclusion of people with specific expertise, for example in engineering, eco-design, urban planning or social work”. We hope you can team up with an eligible student.

How will the competition documents be delivered?

Upon registration, a download link for the competition documents and annexes will be sent to the candidates.

We are seeking clarification on the notion of conflict of interest. Some of our firm’s employees are collaborating with a jury member on a different unrelated project; can our firm and/or employees be eligible to participate in the contest?

Yes, participation is allowed. The situation presented doesn’t reflect an employment or a professional relationship with a member of the jury, but rather a business relationship (whether active or inactive). It will be necessary, however, to respect the confidentiality of the competition participation process and avoid discussing the proposal with jury members.

I understand that registration is done through an eligible professional for their team, not through a team; is this correct? Also, when will the team members’ names will (or have to be) shared? Do you expect groups to to register as representatives of their firm (e.g. ABC Firm team, Firm DEF, etc.)? If so, are there terms and conditions to be signed and should any marketing representation or association with a firm or company be avoided (e.g. putting the company logo on the poster)?

Yes, registration is done through an individual, namely, the eligible representative. However, when the proposal is submitted, the competitor’s name will be requested. The competitor may be a person or a group of persons; for better clarity, said competitor can also be a firm. When submitting the proposal, you will enter the “Name of the competitor as it will appear when the proposals are published”. This could be a single person, a firm or a team of firms or individuals; as an example and depending on the case, the competitor’s name could be entered as such:

  • Firm ABC – person 1, person 2 and person 3
  • Firm ABC – person 4 and person 5
  • Firm DEF
  • Firm GHI + Firm JKL
  • Team Person 6 and person 7
  • Person 8
    Etc.

When submitting your proposal, for each competitor (person, firm or team of firms or persons), you will be asked to indicate the eligible representative name on the form; the names of the other team members will also be required.

For the terms and conditions to be signed, we have added a clause to be ticked when submitting the proposal which states: “As an authorized representative, I hereby submit a proposal for and on behalf of the competitor. I recognize and agree that the Olympic Park has no obligation to validate my authority with the competitor. I acknowledge that any untruthful or incomplete statements may result in the proposal’s disqualification”.

With regard to the presence of a logo on posters, such is strictly forbidden, since proposals must be submitted anonymously. As indicated in the competition document (10.2 – Method of transmission): “In order to maintain anonymity of the proposals, no part of the file titles or content should allow the competitors to be identifiable. Only the entry form, accessible exclusively to the professional advisor, will permit identifying the participants”.

Would the prize be a cheque issued in the name of the eligible representative, considering the “competitor” consists of multiple individuals?

A single prize payment will be made by direct deposit, either in the name of an eligible representative or the firm (company), depending on the situation or your choice.

Section 5.1.1 of the competition document describes the outer membrane as “composed of 63 mainly triangular panels with a surface area ranging between 286 m² and 906 m²” and also “the removal of the outer fabric will be executed by cutting out triangular sections”. However, in the descriptive table of Annex 1, it would appear that the triangular sections vary from 286.4 m² to 906.4 m² and that once dismantled each membrane’s sections would measure 10 m². Is it possible to know the dimensions of the triangular sections, before and after the dismantling? The same goes for the inner membrane.

The information contained in Annex 1 is accurate and up-to-date. Thus, the precise dimensions of the inner and outer membranes before dismantling are those shown in Annex 1.

Regarding the cutting of sections during dismantling, it is likely that the cut shapes vary (some of which may be of triangular shapes). As indicated in said Annex 1, it is currently planned that most cut membranes (both inner and outer) will each measure 10 m². However, larger membranes may be required depending on necessary reuse needs.

Is there a maximum number of students in a team? Would one person be the designated representative for the whole team?

There is no limit on the number of students in a team. Yes, an eligible representative must be selected to register and provide proof of eligibility for the whole team.

When registering by filling in all the fields on the contest site and having obtained a participant number, does another document need to be completed?

Yes, the proposal submission form must also be completed; this form is obtainable via the link generated automatically during registration.

I am writing on behalf of our team to inform you of our intention to participate in the competition’s student category. According to the specified rules of the competition, a professional individual should not be included in a student category, however, we  would like the opportunity to get support and advice from our teachers, and for this reason we propose to appoint one as an advisor to our competition team in compliance with the regulations set forth for participation. The experience and guidance of our teacher will undoubtedly improve our team’s performance and contribute to our success in the competition. We therefore kindly request the consideration and approval of our proposal for advisory support.

Your teacher may support and guide you through proposal development and your team will still qualify for the student category.

Can you please confirm that professionals with construction management degrees are eligible to participate? The university program I graduated from is accredited by the American Council for Construction Education (ACCE).

Individuals holding degrees in construction management are not eligible to participate in this competition as they are not recognized as professionals within the fields of architecture or design (designers or architects).

Is it possible to come on site and see the roof components or to obtain material samples?

No, unfortunately it’s not possible.

Could you send me the SketchUp files in a 2021 version?  I am having difficulties updating the new one.

We are unable to send the files in the SketchUp 2021 version. The components were modeled in Revit and then exported to SketchUp format via SolidWorks. The Olympic Park does not utilize SketchUp.

I have some doubts concerning the materials to be used in the work. Regardless of the current measures and sizes of the structural elements of the roof, we have to use the measures specified in the “post-disassembly details”; is that correct?

Yes, if possible, you should use the measurements specified in the “post-disassembly details”. The dimensions may change slightly depending on the reuse requirements.

How many units should we use in the cases that are not specified, such as “net cables”, “flying masts”, “flying forks” or “deck spars (struts)”.

There are no minimum units required.

There is no direct information about the details of the “perimeter frame” after disassembly.

The disassembly details have not yet been determined.

Is it possible to use new materials in addition to those already given or can only Stadium elements be used specifically? Can some small parts of the given materials be modified?

Yes, it is possible to use new materials and it is also possible to modify certain parts.

In Annex 1, we find inconsistencies or misunderstandings between the indicated numbers that don’t correspond to the quantitative details stated after dismantling and the same for lengths. The length indicated is 3282 meters, but after dismantling we see 6 meters x 540 units = 3240 meters. What are we to understand?

The calculation is correct, as 6 meters x 540 units is equal to 3240 meters. The difference between the two totals constitutes a potential loss in the dismantling process.

In Annex 1, what does minimum/maximum mean on the line titled “length”?

The lengths of the current roof cables vary between 95.8 and 174.9 meters, but they will be reduced to only 6 meters after dismantling.

I am wondering about the discrepancy between the specified cable lengths in Annex 1, the project prompt document vs. the actual dimensions of the CAD files of the cables; it indicates that the majority of the cables are 6 m in length (with some at 5.4 m and 5.6 m). The CAD files of the two different cable types show, however,  a length closer to 2-3 m. Should we assume that the lengths in the document are more accurate or should we work with the shorter cable lengths provided in the CAD files?

IGES or SKP files provided are primarily for visual representation purposes. For precise measurements and specifications, please refer to the information outlined in Annex 1 at all times.

Is it possible to obtain the exploded roof diagram (which must be positioned to the left of poster number 1) in a downloadable format and in a higher quality resolution than what is provided in Annex 1?

We don’t have a better resolution, unfortunately.

Is there a font and a dimension (point) to respect, for the 400-word text required in poster number 1?

No. However, please use a clearly legible font and size as we will be printing the posters for the working sessions with the jury.

Do the layouts of the 2 posters have to absolutely respect those illustrated in reference? Can poster number 2, for example, be divided differently than how indicated on the reference poster and contain text and more than 4 images/diagrams/axonos? Also, can poster number 1, in addition to the required elements such as exploded roof diagram, 400-word text and perspective/axonometric, contain additional images and/or diagrams?

You don’t have to fully adhere to the suggested layout. Poster number 2 can be arranged differently and the number of images/diagrams/axonos/perspectives will depend on your choice. Poster number 1 may also contain other images/diagrams/axonos/perspectives, but make sure that the main representative image of the proposal (axono/perspective) is clearly visible and highlighted.

Can I please request the sample PDF for posters number 1 and 2?

We do not provide a template for the PDF file. The layout of the images on the PDF posters is supplied only as an example and doesn’t need to be reproduced exactly.

Two community scopes appear in the “olympic roof reuse” document, Mercier–Hochelaga-Maisonneuve and Hochelaga-Maisonneuve respectively: which one should we focus on?

The borough in which the Olympic Stadium is located is called Mercier–Hochelaga-Maisonneuve; the Stadium is situated in the Hochelaga-Maisonneuve (HoMa) neighborhood. For the “space design” award category, if a specific site is identified, preference will be given to projects that could be implemented within the vicinity of the Stadium, in the nearby Mercier-Hochelaga-Maisonneuve borough, but preferably in the Hochelaga-Maisonneuve (HoMa) neighborhood

Regarding regulation and property rights, is it possible to access the river from the community, by crossing the port? The question at hand is, whether designers are permitted to incorporate the placement of public access points to the riverbank within the boundaries of the Port in our proposal. My team did not find any laws or regulations addressing this issue.

Yes, you may propose public access to the St. Lawrence River. For the purposes of the design competition, you do not need to be concerned with regulations.

Is it acceptable to incorporate additional materials, either used or new, into my proposal for the competition? Are there any specific guidelines or restrictions regarding the types of materials that can be used ?

Yes, it’s acceptable and no, there are no specific guidelines or restrictions.

The material of the roof, specifically the membranes, has already surpassed its guaranteed life expectancy. Would it be restricted by the government to reuse these membranes for another roof?

No

Are there any security measures or restrictions from the product’s guarantee that I should consider, when reusing these membranes?

No.

Will the flying masts be cut to 5.8 meters and the cable attachment ends removed?

The flying masts will remain intact and the ends will be retained. Disregard the 5.8 meters dimension after dismantling in this case, since the current intention is to maintain the flying masts as is. The roof dismantling plan is proceeding in conjunction with the competition, which explains the data changing occasionally.

I have a question about the struts. If each unit is 6 meters long after demolition while their length varies between 11 and 26 meters, does it mean that these sections will be cut without spindle ends as shown in the drawings/photos?

Spindle ends may not be present in certain sections; based on reuse requirements, the spindles could be retained or reassembled.

I have a question about the liner hangers. If each unit is 5.8 meters long after demolition, while their length varies between 3.6 and 6.2 meters, does it mean that these sections will be cut without ends as shown on the drawings/photos?

The liner hangers  will remain intact and the ends will be retained. Disregard the 5.8 meters dimension after dismantling in this case, since the current intention is to maintain the liner hangers as is.

Is the inner membrane opaque preventing light from passing through?

Yes, precisely.

Can the inner membrane be exposed to UV rays and elements?

Yes, Polyester fabric membranes are usually designed to withstand various environmental conditions.

Is the 3D file named “Bottom Panel Cable – Câbles du Panneau Inférieur (8)” representative of both top panel cables and coating cables?

No, the file named “Bottom Panel Cables – Câbles du Panneau Inférieur (8)” only represents bottom panel cables.

What 3D file represents networked cables? The image on page 34 of the competition document shows an assembly of elements.

Unfortunately, 3D files do not represent networked cables, therefore one must rely on 2D plans and Annex 1 for details. The cables are mostly similar, but have different diameters.

In 3D files, which part do these elements belong to:
Unclassified_PERIMETER_WELDMENT
Unclassified_INNER_KNOT
Unclassified_CABLE_WELDMENT

These elements are not classified in 3D files because they are not among the 12 components presented in Annex 1.

Scroll to Top